Dettagli frammento / Clip details

database
Back to List Indietro
Back
Nuova ricerca
New search
New Search
Back to Title Dettagli titolo
Title details
Invia commenti
Send your feedback
Feedback Form

   
Num. inventario del frammento
Clip inventory number
  9
   

Titolo film
Film title
  Alboino e Rosmunda
Titolo alternativo
Alternate title(s)
  Alboin
Titolo busta Turconi
Title on Turconi env.
  Alboin; Alboino
Casa di produzione
Production co.
  Pasquali
Nazione
Country
  Italy
Data di uscita
Release date
  1909
Regia
Director
  Ernesto Maria Pasquali
Film conservato c/o
Film preserved at
  BFI; Associazione Italiana per le Ricerche di Storia del Cinema

Processi colorazione
Color processes
 
 
Black & White
 
 
 
 

Altri particolari
Other details
 
 

Scritte sui margini
Edge inscriptions
 

Manifatt. pellicola
Stock manufacturer
 
     
Catalogo Joye n.
Joye Catalogue no.
  549
     
Totale frammenti
Total title clips
  108
 
Frammento conservato c/o
Fragment preserved at
  George Eastman House
     
Num. fotogrammi
Number of frames
  3

Note / Notes
See 0001...0029, 8257...8265, 10634...10641, 19731...19787, 21492...21496.

GEH 0001...0029:

[n. 549
Alboin]

GEH 8257...8265:
[n. 549
Alboino
Pasquali 1909]

Friuli 10634...10641:
[Ali Babà (6)
1709
N. 43
1709
? 214 519/91]
Mounted in slide frames. The slide is positioned before paper divider not numbered. [519] is written on slide frame with blue ink. [1] is written on slide frame with red ink - DC

Friuli 19731...19787:
Mounted in slide frames
[Alboino
519]

Friuli 21492...21496:
Mounted in slide frames
[Alboino
549]

Commenti, aggiunte e correzioni / Comments, additions and corrections
JLY 6/19/2009
BFI: http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/26737

JLY 4/20/2009
Fixed the Pasquali-Stock issue, per PCU’s suggestion.d

PCU, 4/20/2009
I just noticed that Pasquali is being credited as Stock Manufacturer. I don’t think this is the case. As far as I know Pasquali was not manufacturing motion picture stock. I’d suggest to delete the reference throughout the database.

UR 1/30/2008
I think it is indeed the “slide box issue.” We need to adapt our procedures to those, and I’m not sure there’s a safe way to get around this confusion by “selective transcribing.” With multiple title envelopes, it was still unambiguous which label referred to which set of clippings (e.g. as they were stapled or folded), but with slide boxes that probably isn’t so. They have writing all over the box plus little dividers with or without dividers, and we may not always be able to make a definite call whicn of the many numbers or titles referred to which set of clippings.
Maybe Daniela can chime in when she finds a chance to review this?

JY 1/28/2008
It’s not very easy to track back the specific envelopes to the specific clippings in this case I’m afraid.

Also, what’s with “Ali Babà in the notes field? Was that what the slide box was labeled, and did it contain two films? It looks like it’s Unid. 10642...10647, title # 0537. Any sense of why the title on Envelope is “Unid.” rather than “Ali Babà”? Also, if a slide box contains multiple titles, it should be noted in the notes field for the relevant titles. In other words, we need to figure out a way not to make it confusing as to why “Ali Babà” is showing up in the notes field for “Alboin”.

UR 1/21/2008

I have found and scanned one additional ”Alboino”envelope below, it reads
[549
Alboino
Pasquale 1090]
Can we trace back which clip inventory numbers it belonged to?