Dettagli frammento / Clip details

database
Back to List Indietro
Back
Nuova ricerca
New search
New Search
Back to Title Dettagli titolo
Title details
Invia commenti
Send your feedback
Feedback Form

   
Num. inventario del frammento
Clip inventory number
  89
   

Titolo film
Film title
 
Titolo alternativo
Alternate title(s)
 
Titolo busta Turconi
Title on Turconi env.
  Unid. 69..102; 6894...6924; 20350...20356
Casa di produzione
Production co.
  Gaumont
Nazione
Country
  France
Data di uscita
Release date
 
Regia
Director
 
Film conservato c/o
Film preserved at
 

Processi colorazione
Color processes
 
 
Tinted   Blue
 
 
 

Altri particolari
Other details
 
 

Scritte sui margini
Edge inscriptions
 

Manifatt. pellicola
Stock manufacturer
  Gaumont
     
Catalogo Joye n.
Joye Catalogue no.
  x130
     
Totale frammenti
Total title clips
  73
 
Frammento conservato c/o
Fragment preserved at
  George Eastman House
     
Num. fotogrammi
Number of frames
  2

Note / Notes
See 69..102, 6894...6924, 20350...20356.

GEH 69..102:
[n. x 130
film senza titolo
(? - Gaumont)]

GEH 6894...6924:
[n. x 130
senza titolo
episodio napoleonico
Gaumont]

Friuli 20350...20356:
Transferred from Ines’s Filemaker Pro CD

[N. 123 x
x 81 II ambiente russo Karamazof?
x 130 810]

Mounted in slide frames (Cineteca del Friuli)

Stored wrong way up probably to separate these 7 slides from the previous 13.

[x 130] written on slide frame.

See also 69..102 [130] and 6894...6924 [n. 130
senza titolo episodio napoleonico Gaumont]. Same film found collected in two envelopes.

Commenti, aggiunte e correzioni / Comments, additions and corrections
UR 8/13/08.
I’ve added notes re. the XRF experiments here and to #238, 338, 436, 437, 594, 760 and will make a separate report on these studies to share with the group or integrate into the next update.
It brings up two issues: again, a notes field unique to each clipping would be a better place for such notes (but then we would want an option to search both notes fields at one). We might also consider adding another, “misc.” image field for anything like these studies, scans of watermarks or the like; or would that just make everything more complicated?

#87: Analysis by X ray fluorescence (XRF) 7/2008 revealed signals for Fe, Ag.
- UR 8/13/08.